RE: Features near PCB Antenna

Ressa — Mon, 01 Jun 2026 10:03:51 GMT

Hi,

New location for nPM2100 looking good.

Br,

RE: Features near PCB Antenna

Germot0 — Sat, 30 May 2026 21:20:21 GMT

Hi Ressa,

Thanks on your feedback!

I move the nPM2100 circuity downwards. Trying to limit ourselves with components on top for the prototype.

What do you think about this new position?

Best,

RE: Features near PCB Antenna

Ressa — Fri, 29 May 2026 11:49:53 GMT

Hi,

Regarding your questions:

[quote user=""]First, I've to place some mounting holes and we already have a defined enclosure. As seen in the picture, they holes will be around 13mm away from the antenna, the screws will be plastic or we will use some kind of rubber holder. I'm not sure how this feature could affect the antenna and if it's worthy considering another enclosure for the prototype.[/quote]

I don't see any issue with that, especially if you are going to use plastic screw. The enclosure material might affect more than the holes and their location as the radio signal has to pass through enclosure. That can be checked once you have assembled the entire prototype.

[quote user=""] Second, we are using a pm2100 for PM and the circuity it's just 1.6 mm away from the keep out zone and I think it may be disturbing the GND plane. We used the suggested stackup of solid GND on bottom and keep out zones for under the RF zone for L2 and L3. We could move the circuity downwards but wanted to understand more deeply how this is possibly, if it actually is, affecting the antenna.[/quote]

The location of entire nPM2100 circuit does not look good. I prefer it to be far from antenna , the current spikes close to antenna/RF section can degrade RX performance. I suggest to move it to other side of PCB if possible.

The antenna itself can be tuned , as long as the full enclosure not dampening the radio signals then tuning antenna would be sufficient for reliable performance. Surrounding components might change the radiation pattern a bit, but usually the total efficiency would be the same . Only thing is to make sure return loss is acceptable.

Best regards,
Ressa