<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF9160 bottom current difference</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128697/nrf9160-bottom-current-difference</link><description>Hello DevZone, 
 One of our key customers is preparing to move their 9160 project into the mass production phase. Recently, they have raised a couple of questions regarding the eDRX bottom current of the 9160 module: 
 
 
 They observed individual variations</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:43:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128697/nrf9160-bottom-current-difference" /></channel></rss>