<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FEM issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128811/fem-issue</link><description>Our device is using NRF54L15 for BLE function. When we test the max distance of ble connection between 2 devices, we get the below results. 
 
 
 We are confused by these results. Shall not the result with FEM and higher Tx power be better than the one</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:23:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128811/fem-issue" /><item><title>RE: FEM issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/569566?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:23:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c8c3fc7a-092f-4165-9c67-a43dd85beea3</guid><dc:creator>stak</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You are right. It seems the errata is not relevant there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The RFX2401C uses a standard 2-pin control interface, which is supported by the nRF54L15 through the Simple GPIO FEM interface.&lt;br /&gt; However, we only validate and test the Skyworks FEMs listed in our supported devices table. When using a different FEM, such as the RFX2401C, it is the customers responsibility to verify that the DeviceTree configuration and GPIO timing parameters meet the requirements of your hardware.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Based on standard configuration for supported skyworks ctx-settle-time-us and crx-settle-time-us should be assigned acoordingly to:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;a href="https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-nrf/blob/main/dts/bindings/radio_fem/skyworks%2Csky66112-11.yaml#L13"&gt;sdk-nrf/dts/bindings/radio_fem/skyworks,sky66112-11.yaml at main · nrfconnect/sdk-nrf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I see that you are setting it to 1us. Please check that these are configured properly.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Let me know how it goes!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Edit: Also check&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;nRF54L section in &lt;a href="https://nrfconnectdocs.nordicsemi.com/ncs/latest/nrf/app_dev/device_guides/fem/fem_simple_gpio.html"&gt;https://nrfconnectdocs.nordicsemi.com/ncs/latest/nrf/app_dev/device_guides/fem/fem_simple_gpio.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FEM issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/569558?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:40:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f3980db4-cbf0-481d-95a6-2271f19c31a4</guid><dc:creator>larry ding</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but we don&amp;#39;t understand why this errata may degrade range. It said&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;power emitted might exceed regulatory limits.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FEM issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/569529?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:03:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4b01837c-38d9-48e4-abf6-37f7b29a1098</guid><dc:creator>stak</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m still looking into the issue, but one thing worth checking is whether your nRF54L15 is affected by this Errata: &lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/r/bundle/errata_nrf54l15_rev1/page/err/nrf54l15/rev1/latest/config_l15_56.html"&gt;https://docs.nordicsemi.com/r/bundle/errata_nrf54l15_rev1/page/err/nrf54l15/rev1/latest/config_l15_56.html&lt;/a&gt;. (Check your revision) The errata specifically applies to the nRF54L15 and describes an issue with external FEM/PA operation, which can degrade range.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There may also be some impact from interference in the test environment, or other explanations, but I would recommend reviewing the errata and trying the proposed workaround as a starting point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stine&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FEM issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/569501?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:28:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0ead283f-194a-4d25-9462-0cf1ec769396</guid><dc:creator>skylu@telit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;we use RFX2401C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the FEM should have configured correctly. because with FWM device and SCAN and connection other&amp;nbsp;BLE devices&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1785147641674v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;here is the DTS&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;amp;radio {&lt;br /&gt; fem = &amp;lt;&amp;amp;nrf_radio_fem&amp;gt;;&lt;br /&gt;};&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/ {&lt;br /&gt; nrf_radio_fem: rfx2401c_fem {&lt;br /&gt; compatible = &amp;quot;skyworks,rfx2401c&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;radio-fem-two-ctrl-pins&amp;quot;;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/* TXEN -&amp;gt; P1.10 ; RXEN -&amp;gt; P0.01 */&lt;br /&gt; ctx-gpios = &amp;lt;&amp;amp;gpio1 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH&amp;gt;;&lt;br /&gt; crx-gpios = &amp;lt;&amp;amp;gpio0 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH&amp;gt;;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ctx-settle-time-us = &amp;lt;1&amp;gt;;&lt;br /&gt; crx-settle-time-us = &amp;lt;1&amp;gt;;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tx-gain-db = &amp;lt;25&amp;gt;;&lt;br /&gt; rx-gain-db = &amp;lt;12&amp;gt;;&lt;br /&gt; };&lt;br /&gt;};&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;here is the config&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;# MPSL + FEM simple GPIO control&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;CONFIG_MPSL&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;=y&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;CONFIG_MPSL_FEM&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;=y&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;CONFIG_MPSL_FEM_SIMPLE_GPIO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;=y&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FEM issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/569499?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:57:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:19463e03-32af-48f6-b1cb-782e2365716c</guid><dc:creator>PaKa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Which FEM are you using and are you sure it is configured correctly?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>