<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Throughput versus range</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128835/throughput-versus-range</link><description>I am 
 I am building a ble device which requires a high throuput (about 400 kbs). Range is also impotant to me. shall i use 1m phy or 2 mphy? 
 My connection Parameters are fine as I achieve about ~800 kbs in theory. Power consumption is not a concern</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 06:53:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128835/throughput-versus-range" /><item><title>RE: Throughput versus range</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/569670?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 06:53:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f95ae5fe-d95a-4b79-a1c9-15e5711753be</guid><dc:creator>Adam Le</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For your use case, 1M phy would be better. 2M phy has a greater data rate but lower receiver sensitivity which might lower your range.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>