<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Regarding the startup current of the nRF54L bootloader</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128837/regarding-the-startup-current-of-the-nrf54l-bootloader</link><description>Hi, I am developing a program for the nRF54L15 with the DFU bootloader enabled. I would like to reduce the startup current. 
 I am using SDK 3.2.4. 
 The `sysbuild.conf` settings are as follows. 
 
 SB_CONFIG_BOOTLOADER_MCUBOOT =y 
 SB_CONFIG_BOOT_SIGNATURE_KEY_FILE</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128837/regarding-the-startup-current-of-the-nrf54l-bootloader" /><item><title>RE: Regarding the startup current of the nRF54L bootloader</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/569832?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d2910b95-0a52-4d3d-a8b4-131a597bd29f</guid><dc:creator>talby</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Simon&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your reply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Upon further investigation, it appears that the startup current of the nRF54L is significantly influenced by the SDK version, even when no bootloader is present.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="jCAhz ChMk0b"&gt;&lt;span class="ryNqvb"&gt;Here is a comparison of the startup current for `peripheral_lbs`.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="jCAhz ChMk0b"&gt;&lt;span class="ryNqvb"&gt; `prj_minimal.conf` is being used.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="jCAhz ChMk0b"&gt;&lt;span class="ryNqvb"&gt;V2.9.1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/peripheral_5F00_lbs_5F00_2.9.1_5F00_1.png.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;V3.2.4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/peripheral_5F00_lbs_5F00_3.2.4_5F00_1.png.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;V3.4.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/peripheral_5F00_lbs_5F00_3.4.0_5F00_1.png.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Although we have not yet investigated the bootloader specifically, the fact that the current varies depending on the SDK suggests that a software-based solution is possible.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We plan to update our project to V3.4.0 in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but we are hoping to achieve current levels comparable to those seen in V2.9.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Regarding the startup current of the nRF54L bootloader</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/569806?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:58:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a95ddf00-09e8-4cb0-8093-5339bb4ec289</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry about the late reply here. I am currently looking into whether the start-up current consumption can be lowered further, but haven&amp;#39;t found anything as of yet. I expect to have more of an answer for you by early next week at the latest. Thank you for your patience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>