<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>clarification needed on nrfsd k version fo nrf54l15 -caaa chip</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128953/clarification-needed-on-nrfsd-k-version-fo-nrf54l15--caaa-chip</link><description>Hi Nordic Team, 
 Could you please clarify the SDK/NCS compatibility for the nRF54L15-CAAA chip? 
 We are planning to develop firmware in bare-metal mode and would like to use nRF Connect SDK v0.80 . 
 Could you please confirm: 
 
 
 Does nRF Connect</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:50:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128953/clarification-needed-on-nrfsd-k-version-fo-nrf54l15--caaa-chip" /><item><title>RE: clarification needed on nrfsd k version fo nrf54l15 -caaa chip</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/570202?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:50:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b72df9e4-5420-4c59-853c-5377504b71e4</guid><dc:creator>Elfving</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Does &lt;strong&gt;nRF Connect SDK v0.80&lt;/strong&gt; officially support the &lt;strong&gt;nRF54L15-CAAA&lt;/strong&gt; variant?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;This is the &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/a-technical-dive-into-the-nrf-connect-sdk-bare-metal-option"&gt;baremetal SDK you are referring to here, which is different from the nRF Connect SDK&lt;/a&gt; (NCS). Although yes, it is supported.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Is the &lt;strong&gt;nRF54L15-CAAA&lt;/strong&gt; fully supported for &lt;strong&gt;bare-metal development&lt;/strong&gt; with this SDK version?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Yes, though it depends on what you mean by &amp;quot;fully&amp;quot;. One important thing to note is that v0.8 is still not fully matured. &lt;a href="https://nrfconnectdocs.nordicsemi.com/ncs-bm/latest/nrf-bm/release_notes/release_notes_0.8.0.html#product-maturity"&gt;For more, see here.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;v1+ is what is considered production-ready. I would definitely recommend you to use the newest version of the SDK.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Which exact &lt;strong&gt;board target / SoC target&lt;/strong&gt; should we select for the nRF54L15-CAAA?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Depends on what board you use. It is typical to use &lt;a href="https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Development-hardware/nRF54L15-DK"&gt;the DK&lt;/a&gt;. Is this what you happen to have?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure we have that many tutorials etc. for the baremetal SDK (&lt;a href="https://nrfconnectdocs.nordicsemi.com/ncs-bm/latest/nrf-bm/index.html"&gt;besides the documentation&lt;/a&gt; that is), but there is&lt;a href="https://youtu.be/31znTI-hnCQ?si=wGNOhGEvgMUsvgp_&amp;amp;t=2414"&gt; atleast something here&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Are there any specific &lt;strong&gt;SoC revisions, errata, HAL, startup files, or configuration changes&lt;/strong&gt; required for this chip variant?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Theoretically, this would depend on the revision of the chip, more than the variant. &lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/r/bundle/comp_matrix_nrf54l15/page/comp/nrf54l15/nrf54l15_ic_revision_overview.html"&gt;Using the build code, you could map this to a certain version&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/r/bundle/comp_matrix_nrf54l15/page/comp/nrf54l15/nrf54l15_nrf_connect_sdk.html"&gt;check compatability&lt;/a&gt;, as well as &lt;a href="https://nrfconnectdocs.nordicsemi.com/ncs/latest/nrf/app_dev/device_guides/nrf54l/errata_nrf54l.html#errata-workaround-status-per-device"&gt;the errata&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though I think the most important changes, like changes to start up files and hal, are something that is typically quickly fixed in the SDK by us.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]If v0.80 does not support the CAAA variant, which &lt;strong&gt;NCS/SDK version&lt;/strong&gt; should we use?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;I would choose the newest baremetal SDK version available if you want to go for that SDK. If you can though, I would go &lt;a href="https://academy.nordicsemi.com/courses/nrf-connect-sdk-fundamentals/"&gt;straight to nRF Connect SDK (NCS) instead of &amp;#39;baremetal&amp;#39;.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;But that choice is ofcourse up to you. I understand that NCS can be a lot to learn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards and let me know if there is anything else!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>