<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is OTA updates a reason to chosse Bluetooth Smart?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/13710/is-ota-updates-a-reason-to-chosse-bluetooth-smart</link><description>Hi, 
 Question regarding blog from Thomas S&amp;#248;derholm ( blog.nordicsemi.com/.../which-technology-should-i-choose-to-connect-my-wearable-device-to-a-phone): 
 Can&amp;#39;t you do update over-the-air with Bluetooth Classic, Zigbee or Thread, etc? 
 Thomas identifies</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 14:42:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/13710/is-ota-updates-a-reason-to-chosse-bluetooth-smart" /><item><title>RE: Is OTA updates a reason to chosse Bluetooth Smart?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/52394?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 14:42:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6e21032d-8847-406c-9852-9bc1277441ed</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I can only speculate that he is highlighting Nordic&amp;#39;s bootloader that is provided as part of the SDK as an advantage. I don&amp;#39;t recall any mention in the Bluetooth Specs to a bootloading service or stack layer. You can do OTA updates with Zigbee, I&amp;#39;ve done a proprietary one on that technology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>