<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>RSA cryptography implementation</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/13945/rsa-cryptography-implementation</link><description>Hi, is there RSA-512 cryptography (or maybe another asymmetric cryptography system) implementation for nrf51 or some implementation that can be easily ported to nrf51?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 16:54:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/13945/rsa-cryptography-implementation" /><item><title>RE: RSA cryptography implementation</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/53284?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 16:54:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fded31aa-798f-4374-99e2-ee6fccff9e89</guid><dc:creator>SRA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yea, I have been under the impression there is almost no reason you&amp;#39;d use RSA on a micro compared to ECC which stores a secure key in a smaller space and generates faster, uses less power, etc. It&amp;#39;s not &amp;quot;more secure&amp;quot; but more efficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But then again... If you want to talk to an RSA device I guess you have no choice to use ECC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RSA cryptography implementation</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/53282?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 09:54:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7b55021b-7a86-484d-afe4-4a4e10a2dd64</guid><dc:creator>RK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ARM bought PolarSSL and rebranded it as mbedTLS, that has an RSA implementation in it. Don&amp;#39;t know what the keysize limit is, but the whole thing is free(*) and since ARM bought it, you&amp;#39;d think a port wouldn&amp;#39;t be very hard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(*) it&amp;#39;s free but is released under two different licenses so you can determine which if either is unencumbered enough for your use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RSA cryptography implementation</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/53283?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 09:22:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:dee468b9-7d6f-4567-84eb-8d93349b921b</guid><dc:creator>Vidar Berg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure if someone implemented RSA on the 51, but maybe you can use ECC instead? The experimental bootloader in SDK 10.0.0 includes a ECC module used for signing of FW images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>