<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Just curious:  Why Vcc max is spec&amp;#39;d at 3.9? ... well ... not 4.2? ;)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14005/just-curious-why-vcc-max-is-spec-d-at-3-9-well-not-4-2</link><description>Hello, 
 It just a diode drop away from 3.9 to 4.2, and 20% typical of a Lipo discharge, just wondering whether the IC design and process is really that tight. The nRF52 runs on a wide dc Vcc range, I especially like the low voltage side, this shows</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 01:09:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14005/just-curious-why-vcc-max-is-spec-d-at-3-9-well-not-4-2" /><item><title>RE: Just curious:  Why Vcc max is spec'd at 3.9? ... well ... not 4.2? ;)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/53478?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 01:09:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9b7a778d-96c7-4272-9500-a938c55cc1ba</guid><dc:creator>FI</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarification.  Regards&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Just curious:  Why Vcc max is spec'd at 3.9? ... well ... not 4.2? ;)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/53477?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 10:53:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:46a017e5-59b2-405b-8013-a7fb4604c3d7</guid><dc:creator>Stian R&amp;#248;ed Hafskjold</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, 3.9V is not really within spec. &lt;strong&gt;3.6V&lt;/strong&gt; is the max recommended operating voltage: &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52832.ps.v1.0/recommended_op_conditions.html?cp=2_2_0_4#concept_vng_xls_2q"&gt;infocenter.nordicsemi.com/.../recommended_op_conditions.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.9V is from the absolute maximum before you brick the chip: &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52832.ps.v1.0/abs_max_ratings.html?cp=2_2_0_3#abs_max_ratings"&gt;infocenter.nordicsemi.com/.../abs_max_ratings.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maximum ratings are the extreme limits
to which the chip can be exposed for a
limited amount of time without
permanently damaging it. Exposure to
absolute maximum ratings for prolonged
periods of time may affect the
reliability of the device.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>