<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nrfjprog fails to load JLinkARM on Linux</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14148/nrfjprog-fails-to-load-jlinkarm-on-linux</link><description>I didn&amp;#39;t manage to find a solution to my problem here but I fixed it myself so I&amp;#39;m posting it just in case it helps someone else. 
 I installed JLink 5.12.6 and nRF5x Command Line Tools 8.4.0 on 64 bit Ubuntu. 
 When trying to execute &amp;quot;./nrfjprog -v</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 12:58:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14148/nrfjprog-fails-to-load-jlinkarm-on-linux" /><item><title>RE: nrfjprog fails to load JLinkARM on Linux</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/342546?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 12:58:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e724ca3d-bab8-4a6d-8df5-db123efe36ad</guid><dc:creator>Pipper</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Try to use the gdb debugger option. It seems to work thereby highlighting the problem to be related to the flashing process&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrfjprog fails to load JLinkARM on Linux</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/54072?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:46:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:677524a6-eed0-40fd-9c9c-14bdc962bbad</guid><dc:creator>Gustavo Velasco-Hern&amp;#225;ndez</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi @hkn, I&amp;#39;m still getting load failed message after forcing symlink, Should I create another question with &lt;code&gt;strace nrfjprog -i&lt;/code&gt; output?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrfjprog fails to load JLinkARM on Linux</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/54071?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 06:50:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f29c2e3f-b066-448b-a5bc-533f82421a72</guid><dc:creator>H&amp;#229;kon Alseth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was able to replicate this scenario at my end as well.
It seems that the .deb package from segger does not force the symlink to be updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had the version v5.10.21, and installed v5.12.7. My symlink points to the older version (which is non-existing):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 april 20 13:07 /usr/lib/libjlinkarm.so -&amp;gt; /opt/SEGGER/JLink/libjlinkarm.so.5.10.2
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a temporary workaround, you can force the symlink:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;sudo ln -fs /opt/SEGGER/&amp;lt;rest_of_path&amp;gt;/libjlinkarm.so /usr/lib/libjlinkarm.so
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will report this back to our nrfjprog team, so that they can inform SEGGER directly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you still have issues with nrfjprog throwing an error, please run:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;strace nrfjprog -i
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And post the output of this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Håkon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrfjprog fails to load JLinkARM on Linux</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/54070?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 16:25:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:47242bdb-0baf-4f15-8f16-6af042139c0b</guid><dc:creator>netz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A symlink seems to be more appropos, as this is usually what is done anyways&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>