<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Passing Out-of-Band key to Peer Manager?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14391/passing-out-of-band-key-to-peer-manager</link><description>I&amp;#39;m trying to add authentication with a key acquired Out-of-Band to a Peripheral BLE device in which I already have non-MITM bonding working. I&amp;#39;m using the Peer Manager module with the s132 SoftDevice. I&amp;#39;m not sure how I provide the OOB key as the Temporary</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:55:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14391/passing-out-of-band-key-to-peer-manager" /><item><title>RE: Passing Out-of-Band key to Peer Manager?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/54957?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8c0a1853-1a1c-4f07-a6b4-774ec90245a7</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes. Both LESC and Legacy end up with 128-bit encryption keys, and these are equally secure. The power consumption will be the same after pairing is done. LESC uses a more complex algorithm so it will use more power during the pairing process. The difference is in the key generation algorithm. It depends on what kind of attacks you want to protect against. If you do OOB with legacy and you are sure that the attacker can&amp;#39;t get the OOB data, you are secure. If the attacker can get this data, you should go for LESC. What kind of central device are you connecting to? Does it support OOB and/or LESC?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Passing Out-of-Band key to Peer Manager?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/54956?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:32:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d3d70707-8c5a-43b7-87d6-615b0b249964</guid><dc:creator>Elias</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;edit: Now that I look it over again, is the difference between those two just the strength of the key generation algorithm? I assume the tradeoff between the two pairing methods is strength of security vs. power consumption, so since I want my connections to be bulletproof, I want to use LESC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Passing Out-of-Band key to Peer Manager?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/54955?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:01:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7fdacbed-cf4a-41c9-a6a8-e3c6d50d9bd6</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you want LESC pairing or &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.s132.api.v2.0.0/group___b_l_e___g_a_p___p_e_r_i_p_h___b_o_n_d_i_n_g___p_k___c_e_n_t_r_a_l___o_o_b___m_s_c.html?cp=2_3_0_1_0_2_1_3_8_7_3"&gt;Legacy pairing&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>