<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Firmware update for serialization scenario?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14593/firmware-update-for-serialization-scenario</link><description>From what I can see the scenario where you have a serialized app running from a separate CPU and how to do firmware update on that is not discussed anywhere on the Nordic site and I am trying to get some ideas so I will not find myself duplicating a lot</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:26:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14593/firmware-update-for-serialization-scenario" /><item><title>RE: Firmware update for serialization scenario?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/55700?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:26:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d7bbc303-c6b5-4df2-a588-b897f09ee4cb</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Catalin,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I afraid that there is not much work has been done regarding having DFU for the connectivity chip in serialization set-up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DFU process requires a bootloader. It&amp;#39;s not possible or I would say pretty complicated to integrate the DFU functionality into the main connectivity application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The closest we have is the SPI bootloader that you can have a look &lt;a href="https://github.com/NordicSemiconductor/nrf51-dfu-spi-slave"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not fully understand what you mentioned here:
&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;however the very quick move from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1 raises the valid question if we would not be much better on the longer term having a very clean upgrade path in the Nordic circuit too&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you explain a little bit more?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>