<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>What&amp;#39;s the Throughput of nRF OpenMesh?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14966/what-s-the-throughput-of-nrf-openmesh</link><description>I consider using &amp;quot; nRF OpenMesh &amp;quot; to implement my project.
But, I have no idea bout what&amp;#39;s the throughput of it.
Anyone has an idea?
I find the max. content of advertisement data is 23 Bytes from the site .
So, can I say the limitation of OpenMesh</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:58:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/14966/what-s-the-throughput-of-nrf-openmesh" /><item><title>RE: What's the Throughput of nRF OpenMesh?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/57096?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:58:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ed821b14-9239-4ce5-b60e-37d0f7588cd7</guid><dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Trond, the throughput is improved, indeed, by distributing data across several data handles via your adverse, thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: What's the Throughput of nRF OpenMesh?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/57095?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:05:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4df9acd5-2b16-428c-990e-5433f031e6b3</guid><dc:creator>Trond Einar Snekvik</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4.6kbps seems like a reasonable throughput number. The minimum advertising interval is per data-handle, and can be significantly improved by distributing data across several data handles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In our experiments, we&amp;#39;ve been able to get around 10kbps with 100ms minimum advertisement interval, when split over 30 handles (accounting for packet loss and acknowledgements), but your milage may vary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>