Does BLE save much power if connection is always active?

Does BLE save much power if connection is always active?https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/15573/does-ble-save-much-power-if-connection-is-always-activeI have a use case where sensors on a BLE peripheral need to push notifications to a BLE central indeterministically. So it needs to keep the connection always on. The notification latency should also be low enough (maybe ~ 30ms or less), which sets requirementen-USTelligent Community 13Fri, 05 Aug 2016 06:21:00 GMTRE: Does BLE save much power if connection is always active?https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/59434?ContentTypeID=1Fri, 05 Aug 2016 06:21:00 GMT137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:11105a4c-f92c-4716-be54-237c6fd029e4Øyvind Karlsen<p>Hi,</p> <p>Have a look at the <a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/power/">online power profiler</a> to get an idea of what kind of power consumption you will see. It will at any rate be more efficient than Bluetooth Classic, since it does still sleep quite a lot.</p> <p>Best regards,</p> <p>Øyvind</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>