<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is nRFGO is fully fonctionnal with Segger jlink basic ?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/15587/is-nrfgo-is-fully-fonctionnal-with-segger-jlink-basic</link><description>Hi, 
 In order to start my own board with nRF52 component throught SWD, I think I&amp;#39;ve to use Segger Jlink. I expect to buy the basic version, that sound good for me, but I read somewhere (I don&amp;#39;t find it out again) that Segger jlink+ may be required to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:41:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/15587/is-nrfgo-is-fully-fonctionnal-with-segger-jlink-basic" /><item><title>RE: Is nRFGO is fully fonctionnal with Segger jlink basic ?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/59472?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:41:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1d83d4ba-14ab-44b8-980f-8b89950ba81c</guid><dc:creator>Vidar Berg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All j-link models are compatible with the 52 series, so the BASE version will work. It&amp;#39;s only if you want to utilize the &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/blogs/909/debugging-nrf52-series-devices-using-trace/"&gt;ETM trace&lt;/a&gt; feature that you will need the more expensive J-trace model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>