<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>BLE sniffer - delta time is inaccurate?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/16210/ble-sniffer---delta-time-is-inaccurate</link><description>Hi,
I&amp;#39;m i&amp;#39;m sniffing the NRF51822 s110, using the Nordic&amp;#39;s BLE sniffer (on s120). 
 The BLE device is in a connection, and do a connection parameter update to a new interval of 108.75ms (indicated as 87 in the LL_CONNECTION_UPDATE_REQ). 
 I&amp;#39;m trying</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:52:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/16210/ble-sniffer---delta-time-is-inaccurate" /><item><title>RE: BLE sniffer - delta time is inaccurate?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/61909?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:52:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6c6b7b3a-4ea2-44f6-8bd4-cb8f72cead90</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Hagay: Unfortunately, I&amp;#39;m afraid there is not much development/bugfix for the sniffer is happening at the moment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: BLE sniffer - delta time is inaccurate?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/61908?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 07:58:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4da14b48-5e44-4687-b54f-fe5a90cc9177</guid><dc:creator>Hagay H.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the reply. Will you correct this issue? it is rather uncomfortable to perform timing analysis this way.
A lot of times i need to synchronize the WS log to other logs. This is done most of the time using time differernces.
Is there a way to add some more fields regarding the timestamp? I will be happy to continue this via private messaging.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: BLE sniffer - delta time is inaccurate?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/61907?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 07:46:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e3f35e84-bae8-47e4-bb3f-d19888fd9f3f</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Hagay,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just checked with the developer. You are correct. The delta time &amp;quot;end to start&amp;quot; is the one that is reliable. The &amp;quot;start to start&amp;quot; is not correct one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And your calculation is correct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The time stamp on the TIME column also not reliable since it&amp;#39;s the time stamp on UART on PC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are some cases on devzone where we recommend the use of &amp;quot;start to start&amp;quot;, we would need to correct them. Please report back if you spot one of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Btw, please use Wireshark v1.10.x instead of v1.12. The sniffer is best when using with v1.10.x (so that the Nordic plugin will be used, not the BLE plugin from Wireshark).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>