<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>JLink loadfile issue when combining Extended Segment and Extended Linear addresses in Hex file</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/16433/jlink-loadfile-issue-when-combining-extended-segment-and-extended-linear-addresses-in-hex-file</link><description>We have been working on a project that requires the following separate segments be programmed to the board: 
 
 softdevice hex file 
 app hex file 
 UICR hex file 
 
 We are using a Segger JLink + GCC as our development environment. 
 We merge</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:50:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/16433/jlink-loadfile-issue-when-combining-extended-segment-and-extended-linear-addresses-in-hex-file" /><item><title>RE: JLink loadfile issue when combining Extended Segment and Extended Linear addresses in Hex file</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/62881?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:50:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6e771177-4fd7-42c7-8237-4fd8bb30b3d6</guid><dc:creator>bjorn-spockeli</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@shaba : Yes, using mergehex is probably more convinient than removing the EOF marker in the hex.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: JLink loadfile issue when combining Extended Segment and Extended Linear addresses in Hex file</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/62879?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:35:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:766fbf74-ded0-4f74-87b5-b2b0a40f87a9</guid><dc:creator>bjorn-spockeli</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy to help :) Let me know how it goes!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: JLink loadfile issue when combining Extended Segment and Extended Linear addresses in Hex file</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/62878?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:11:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6f95fa28-bb15-454b-86fe-56bbd988ed41</guid><dc:creator>shaba</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Bjørn, this looks amazingly useful. We use the debug tools provided by Jlink as well - I will report back if this same issue mentioned above does not occur with the nrfjprog tool. The cask install went smoothly but its 3 AM here and I need some sleep :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: JLink loadfile issue when combining Extended Segment and Extended Linear addresses in Hex file</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/62880?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:32:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fc216516-26cd-4216-a07b-9dd57fe6ce2b</guid><dc:creator>bjorn-spockeli</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you see the same behaviour if you use our &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.tools/dita/tools/nrf5x_command_line_tools/nrf5x_nrfjprogexe.html?resultof=%22%6e%72%66%6a%70%72%6f%67%22%20"&gt;nrfjprog&lt;/a&gt; commandline tool?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>