<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Peer manager LESC &amp;#39;Just works&amp;#39; Pairing bug</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/16529/peer-manager-lesc-just-works-pairing-bug</link><description>Problem description : 
 When using &amp;#39;Just works&amp;#39; pairing with LESC key exchange peer_manager doesn&amp;#39;t allocate buffer for peer public key and doesn&amp;#39;t pass own public key to sd_ble_gap_sec_params_reply on BLE_GAP_EVT_SEC_PARAMS_REQUEST . This results in</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:45:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/16529/peer-manager-lesc-just-works-pairing-bug" /><item><title>RE: Peer manager LESC 'Just works' Pairing bug</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/63238?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:45:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7cd74a0b-429e-4ce7-b0a0-358e76c03014</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It should be fixed in 13.0.0-1.alpha (and later)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Peer manager LESC 'Just works' Pairing bug</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/63237?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:36:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:99c01244-01c5-40c3-9351-ea12fc518628</guid><dc:creator>WestCoastDaz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Carles, Has this issue been address in any of the recent SDK updates? Is this still the preferred solution? Thanks, Darren&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Peer manager LESC 'Just works' Pairing bug</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/63235?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:27:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:babdedd2-66a3-450a-894c-185c6fc115c8</guid><dc:creator>Carles</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, just checked&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Peer manager LESC 'Just works' Pairing bug</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/63234?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:23:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:857d3fd6-90b0-45da-b95a-f06c153c0e99</guid><dc:creator>Susheel Nuguru</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;is this also present in SDK11?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Peer manager LESC 'Just works' Pairing bug</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/63236?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0252bb0c-c7c2-471e-8e84-c4cc7153f130</guid><dc:creator>Carles</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The code you posted looks correct. We are still working towards fixing this internally but at first glance I see no problem with your solution. If we find any side-effects or additional fixes we will update the post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>