Question of nRF52 + Gazell data rate?

RE: Question of nRF52 + Gazell data rate?

Håkon Alseth — Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:55:23 GMT

Please open a new case with your question. This thread is ~3 years old.

RE: Question of nRF52 + Gazell data rate?

John henrry — Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:40:42 GMT

Hello, can you send sourcode? thank you.

RE: Question of nRF52 + Gazell data rate?

Vincent Hsu — Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:10:20 GMT

The problem is from setting channel table size. I setting different channel table size between the nRF52 and nRF24Lxx.

Thank you so much！

RE: Question of nRF52 + Gazell data rate?

Kenneth — Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:31:31 GMT

Hi,

I don't know what is the problem with this specific code. It might be related to the manual handling of the HFCLK in some way, or something completely else. My recommendation in this case is to use the default nRF5 projects for Gazell in the latest SDK as a starting point.

I have verified that the experimental Gazell release in nRF5 SDK v12 have much higher throughput (200Hz), as test I used the nRF52 as device and nRF51 as host. I did not test with the nRF24L-series in specific, but considering you mention it works with nRF51, that test should still be relevant. If you want to achieve higher throughput (800Hz) you should look at this answer.