<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Future nRF5x chip with better RF power output control steps?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/16728/future-nrf5x-chip-with-better-rf-power-output-control-steps</link><description>Are there plans to create a nRF5x micro that has finer control over the RF power output? I&amp;#39;m currently using an nRF52, and the 4dBm steps are pushing the limits of our intended application. Ideally, I would love to have 0.5dBm or even 0.1dBm output power</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:07:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/16728/future-nrf5x-chip-with-better-rf-power-output-control-steps" /><item><title>RE: Future nRF5x chip with better RF power output control steps?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/63979?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:07:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:969a10c8-54df-43cd-8937-37e00125aedd</guid><dc:creator>CurtisHx</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@TomWS I&amp;#39;m looking for resolution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Future nRF5x chip with better RF power output control steps?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/63978?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 22:55:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2d4fba26-d80a-4ade-9539-dc261ea5fc25</guid><dc:creator>TomWS</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you looking for resolution or accuracy?  In my experience (with nRF51), the accuracy is very good. If you change the output power by 4dBm, the resulting signal changes by exactly that (within the normal measurable variation in signal strength).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Future nRF5x chip with better RF power output control steps?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/63980?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:13:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:64a94670-d5e0-4e8a-86d3-f97093b8af93</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Curtis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately there are no current plans to release a chip with a higher accuracy on the TX output power setting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;
Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>