<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nrF51822 gazelle enhanced shockburst</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/1690/nrf51822-gazelle-enhanced-shockburst</link><description>What is the difference between Gazelle and Enhanced Shockburst on the nRF51822? Is one faster or more energy efficient? 
 Thanks,
Tom</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:28:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/1690/nrf51822-gazelle-enhanced-shockburst" /><item><title>RE: nrF51822 gazelle enhanced shockburst</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/7478?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:28:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:12eb3302-4751-41ee-8431-f4357901ed50</guid><dc:creator>H&amp;#229;kon Alseth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It can, but not by-default. You would have to implement a layer on top of ESB for frequency hopping.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrF51822 gazelle enhanced shockburst</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/7477?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:42:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2449e5f6-cd44-4c7f-bc7f-73f35d0299c2</guid><dc:creator>chenyu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;can ESB realize a frequence hopping?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrF51822 gazelle enhanced shockburst</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/7479?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:18:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:df484d88-cc33-4986-8e57-5e2296a4923b</guid><dc:creator>jcdergan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Hakon!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrF51822 gazelle enhanced shockburst</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/7476?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:48:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a9b870fa-976a-4e29-821f-31cb23121c3d</guid><dc:creator>H&amp;#229;kon Alseth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both ESB and GZLL is based on the same framework in nRF51x22, so their performance is very similar.
GZLL has a top layer, which also includes frequency hopping/frequency agility to ensure a stable RF link, which again may give a lesser performance due to re-transmissions (when sync&amp;#39;ing transmitter and receiver.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ESB is a bit more simple, where it handles auto-ACKing under-the-hood, and it communicates on a static RF channel (no hopping)
If you look at the nRF24L01+ datasheet, you can read more about the ESB protocol and how it&amp;#39;s built up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards
Håkon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>