<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>[ble_advertising] GAP filter policies while using whitelist</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/18238/ble_advertising-gap-filter-policies-while-using-whitelist</link><description>Hello, 
 Working on a project using the pairing and bonding security model, I would like to filter out of a central&amp;#39;s scan all already bonded peripheral devices. Or, I could read in the BLE specification that it should be possible using the white-list</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:46:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/18238/ble_advertising-gap-filter-policies-while-using-whitelist" /><item><title>RE: [ble_advertising] GAP filter policies while using whitelist</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/70440?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:46:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ca220bdc-6899-46ea-a417-b48e2aad783a</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, It was decided to close this issue as won&amp;#39;t fix. So unless we get more requests like this, we won&amp;#39;t make this improvement. I&amp;#39;m really sorry for the inconvinience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: [ble_advertising] GAP filter policies while using whitelist</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/70439?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:08:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fbb57e11-18b2-42a7-8a09-6070e86b110b</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Patrice. I agree this should not have been hardcoded and have added this as an improvement suggestion in our internal tracking system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: [ble_advertising] GAP filter policies while using whitelist</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/70438?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:07:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bc643874-f939-4404-8eb7-c6600e7989e6</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Advertisements are always visible. the scanreq filter policies stops the advertiser from replying to scan requests from unknown devices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: [ble_advertising] GAP filter policies while using whitelist</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/70437?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:12:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:052c733a-f157-49db-8ce3-3f0bc49e73e8</guid><dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Related to the GAP filter policy, is there a way to send advertising packets and scan responses only to the central/scanner devices which are in the advertising whitelist ?
Using the &lt;code&gt;BLE_GAP_ADV_FP_FILTER_SCANREQ&lt;/code&gt; filter policy, has soon as one device is scanning, the other scanners are able to see the advertising device. Is this the correct behavior ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>