<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Question related to the FPU anomaly.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/18298/question-related-to-the-fpu-anomaly</link><description>[87] CPU: Unexpected wake from System ON Idle when using FPU 
 This anomaly applies to IC Rev. Rev 1, build codes QFAA-B00, QFAB-B00, CIAA-B00.
 
 I have the PCA10040. While using the nRFgo Studio 1.21.2, I couldn&amp;#39;t find the build-code of the MCU which</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2016 08:24:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/18298/question-related-to-the-fpu-anomaly" /><item><title>RE: Question related to the FPU anomaly.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/70673?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2016 08:24:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c3a6f130-9b2b-4e35-be6c-0a61dc04e840</guid><dc:creator>RichieJH</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Endnode has this answered below, but just to add don&amp;#39;t worry about this anomaly.  It is just the ARM Cortex having an FPU interrupt that needs to be cleared before calling sleep.  Just add those lines per the note and sorted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Question related to the FPU anomaly.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/70674?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:57:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:73f4ac05-24e8-4ec1-8795-47fe9f981359</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A) There is a workaround for this anomaly mentioned in anomaly description so you CAN use FPU even if your chip revision is affected, just implement that code (I would actually bet it is already included in nRF5 SDK so check that if you use it).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;B) If you see second row printed on your chip you can clearly see that you have &amp;quot;QFAA-B00&amp;quot; so this chip is affected. Link between 6-char/digit identifier on IC packaging and build code is pretty clearly explained at Nordic infocenter &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52832.ps.v1.1/ordering_info.html?cp=2_2_0_51#concept_vng_xls_2q"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers Jan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>