<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF52 OFF wake on GPIO current consumption (vs. nRF51)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19134/nrf52-off-wake-on-gpio-current-consumption-vs-nrf51</link><description>I have a design running on nRF51 that I&amp;#39;m evaluating to run on nRF52. One important characteristic I&amp;#39;m looking for is to store it for long period with a minimum power consumption and a simple way to turn it back ON with a &amp;quot;user pusher&amp;quot; (not a reset button</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:31:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19134/nrf52-off-wake-on-gpio-current-consumption-vs-nrf51" /><item><title>RE: nRF52 OFF wake on GPIO current consumption (vs. nRF51)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/74052?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:31:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ee0f2e3b-6762-44d3-99de-5fbec97c9d57</guid><dc:creator>ThierryC</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;0
ThierryC gravatar image
ThierryC
36 ●1 ●3
answered just now
Thanks for the answer, I prefer this number and of course that is solving my issue !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52 OFF wake on GPIO current consumption (vs. nRF51)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/74051?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:50:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bb326ef5-4395-4177-b01a-607aca7af403</guid><dc:creator>Sigurd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for reporting this. This is a documentation bug. The correct value for &lt;code&gt;IOFF_RAMOFF_GPIO System OFF, No RAM retention, Wake on GPIO&lt;/code&gt; is &lt;strong&gt;0.3 μA&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>