<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>BLE Nano printing</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19154/ble-nano-printing</link><description>I am using the example ble central devices from the SDK 8.1. The example provided prints out to pin 19 (the on-board LED). I wanted to change the functionality to print to an external LED that was attached to a different pin (pin 28). To do this I went</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 05:01:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19154/ble-nano-printing" /><item><title>RE: BLE Nano printing</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/74138?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 05:01:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:caf40e0d-b271-4127-b42e-f0ef204ca449</guid><dc:creator>tyler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Alright that would make sense.  Is there any way I can correct the code to account for the changed circuit?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: BLE Nano printing</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/74137?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 20:29:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e601656e-e68a-48c5-9eb5-a13cf7654442</guid><dc:creator>Roger Clark</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Its possible that the existing LED was connected between Vcc and the pin ( via a resistor) and have wired your LED from the GPIO to Gnd.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the top layer of the PCB had a copper plane that was Vcc, then for surface mount devices, connecting from that Vcc plane to the LED would save 1 via hole.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: BLE Nano printing</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/74136?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:59:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e0a6cbfa-3487-4984-9f52-fd3a501f9b46</guid><dc:creator>tyler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am positive that I made no changes other than the pin number.  One thing to note is that originally it wasn&amp;#39;t an open GPIO pin but an led that is already soldered onto the board.  It is just controlled like a GPIO pin.  Is it possible that the signal is inverted for the on board LED?  Also we are using an old version of the SDK because we were following an example that was using it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: BLE Nano printing</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/74135?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 06:43:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9b222756-3eac-4118-a753-af62faff9537</guid><dc:creator>Roger Clark</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This seems unlikely, all the GPIO pins behave the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you sure the code does not have any other changes?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW. Why are you using such and old version of the SDK ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>