<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF5 SDK 12 &amp;amp; nRF52 Preview DK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19649/nrf5-sdk-12-nrf52-preview-dk</link><description>I have been trying to use nRF5 SDK 12 on nRF52 Preview DK by using PCA10040 instead of the removed PCA10036. But example &amp;#39;ble_app_hrs&amp;#39; that uses SoftDevice S132 v3.0 do not work on nRF52 Preview DK. 
 
 
 Is it expected? 
 
 
 the same example from</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:20:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19649/nrf5-sdk-12-nrf52-preview-dk" /><item><title>RE: nRF5 SDK 12 &amp; nRF52 Preview DK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/76462?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:20:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5f1db891-b9ed-400a-b8c8-c4f967636a3a</guid><dc:creator>FormerMember</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The chip on PCA 10036 is an Engineering  A chip, and the chip on PCA 10040 v. 1.1 is a revision 1 chip, see &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.nordic.infocenter.nrf52%2Fdita%2Fnrf52%2Fcompatibility_matrix%2Fic_revision_overview.html&amp;amp;cp=2_0_4"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; IC revision overview table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you compare &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.nordic.infocenter.nrf52%2Fdita%2Fnrf52%2Ferrata.html&amp;amp;cp=2_2_1"&gt;the errata list&lt;/a&gt; for Engineering A and revision 1, it may explain why examples working on PCA 10040 doesn&amp;#39;t work on PCA 10036. Also, for the same reason, we do not recommend to use PCA 10036 for development. Therefore, I would not recommend you to port SDK 12 examples to S132 v.2.0.0, to make them work with PCA10036.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>