<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>GPIO state unpredictable when Vdd is below 1.6V URGENT!!!</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19666/gpio-state-unpredictable-when-vdd-is-below-1-6v-urgent</link><description>Hi dev team,
in my design I am using the nRF52832. 
 On the GPIOs (P0.14,P0.15) I&amp;#39;ve connected a Darlington Array ( ST ULN2001 ). 
 My circuit is living of a super cap and therefore the voltage ramp during the initial charge is very slow.
On some</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:13:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19666/gpio-state-unpredictable-when-vdd-is-below-1-6v-urgent" /><item><title>RE: GPIO state unpredictable when Vdd is below 1.6V URGENT!!!</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/76509?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:13:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:014686a9-d2c1-443e-9779-96e4842ab2f7</guid><dc:creator>TY</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why a diode?
Do you think the threshold voltage would avoid the Darlington Array to turn on?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: GPIO state unpredictable when Vdd is below 1.6V URGENT!!!</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/76508?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 22:49:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:108ba89e-0ceb-450a-8df4-fa32db33f80f</guid><dc:creator>Roger Clark</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you considered putting a diode between the GPIO and the Darlington input?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: GPIO state unpredictable when Vdd is below 1.6V URGENT!!!</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/76506?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:49:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1844a10a-6afa-48b2-b5e0-87ad72f27e8d</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Default pin state is: Input pin, &lt;strong&gt;No Pull&lt;/strong&gt;, Disconnected input buffer, S0S1 drive, Sense Disabled&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: GPIO state unpredictable when Vdd is below 1.6V URGENT!!!</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/76507?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:01:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8f40ea28-1885-4850-99db-812df52c3bee</guid><dc:creator>Krunal Desai</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&amp;#39;t &amp;lt;1.7V undefined operating region for the part? I&amp;#39;d argue that this is exactly what pull-down resistors are for -- enforcing the state of the system before a device comes out of reset / can assert pin states. The internal GPIO cells may simply not function below a certain VDD where the transistor Vt can&amp;#39;t be met.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10K-100K PDs would fix this I think -- 330uA &amp;quot;wasted&amp;quot; with a 10K, 33 with a 100K assuming 3.3V target VDD. But I would treat those pins as 100% floating nets until the nRF can operate and set output levels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An alternate would be finding a part with an EN pin or similar, where you can pay the penalty for a pull-down only once instead of per channel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>