<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Receiving internal error on securing BLE link</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19987/receiving-internal-error-on-securing-ble-link</link><description>At the moment I am working on a project that uses the nRF52328 acting as both a peripheral and central to connect 3 separate devices intermittently. I am storing their bonding information. A current problem I have now is that, due to an inconvenience</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:18:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/19987/receiving-internal-error-on-securing-ble-link" /><item><title>RE: Receiving internal error on securing BLE link</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/77778?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:18:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2994750e-5cc4-4ac0-90e3-c8e2714a1a8d</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great! I converted my comment to an answer, appreciate if you accept it. Just click the circle next to it, thx.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Receiving internal error on securing BLE link</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/77777?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:17:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bb8d3d33-2116-4884-a860-1e32dbe30a5e</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Peter,
I have switched to SDK 11.0.0.0 and that seems to have corrected the issue. Thanks for the advice!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Receiving internal error on securing BLE link</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/77776?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:00:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:105802c2-061b-42c2-a9c8-1e79e45e455a</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok. That explains it :) I recommend using a production version of the SDK, not an alpha, if that is inconvenient I recommend porting a newer version of the Peer Manager/FDS/Fstorage, to see if that fixes the issue. If I remember correctly, the Peer Manager library in SDK 10.0.0 (and SDK 11.0.0.2-alpha) was experimental, so quite a lot of changes and bug fixes have been applied in later releases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Receiving internal error on securing BLE link</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/77775?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:19:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:df81e6fa-e5b2-4643-bb9d-db20685acc67</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, just to clarify I am using the SDK 11.0.0.2-alpha. I believe in SDK 11.0.0 it corresponds to  pm_peer_count().&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Receiving internal error on securing BLE link</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/77774?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:05:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9ccb0347-adb2-4b6b-b938-65c016c1fc59</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you sure you are using SDK11.0.0? I couldn&amp;#39;t find any pm_n_peers() function in the Peer Manager library there, but I found it it SDK10.0.0, which doesn&amp;#39;t support nRF52.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>