<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Data Packet Length Extension and Number of Packets that can be sent</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/20090/data-packet-length-extension-and-number-of-packets-that-can-be-sent</link><description>If I enable the Data Packet Length Extension and I enable the Connection Event Length Extension, having a connection interval of ~400ms I know that I can reach up to 251 bytes, but how many packets can I send per connection?? 
 
 
 I am creating an</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:32:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/20090/data-packet-length-extension-and-number-of-packets-that-can-be-sent" /><item><title>RE: Data Packet Length Extension and Number of Packets that can be sent</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/78216?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:32:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e7118a1a-d77b-4ae8-ae77-b80c7b8c7e83</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi User1321,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Basic math is not making sense here. You want to send 156 bytes of data every 1ms which means ~1.25Mbps. That&amp;#39;s on the edge of what BT5.0 can achieve with 2Mbps link data rate and all possible optimizations (see &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/blogs/1078/throughput-and-long-range-demo/"&gt;this blog post&lt;/a&gt;). My personal guess is that you would never make it work reliably at this throughput. You might be able to achieve it with nRF52840 and custom radio protocol (not BLE) but then my question would be why to choose low power radio chip when your application is clearly high-throughput &amp;quot;streaming like&amp;quot; beast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers Jan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>