<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gazell nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/22398/gazell-nrf51822</link><description>Does the s210 softdevice not function on the nRF51822? I see it available for the nRF51422 here but it is listed under the 51422 only. 
 I have a v1.1.0 PCA10031 (nrf51422) and have written an LED blink example with s210 linked in and it works. If I</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 20:48:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/22398/gazell-nrf51822" /><item><title>RE: Gazell nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/88090?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 20:48:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:dc623e55-f837-4853-8329-e8bbc91c4095</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Kohlsmith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Jørgen. I&amp;#39;ve got it building and running now without any softdevice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Gazell nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/88089?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 09:08:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2b58ba95-c8cf-4e1d-bc15-e4c81eb438da</guid><dc:creator>J&amp;#248;rgen Holmefjord</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Gazell does not require any softdevice. You only need softdevice if you want to run &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.sdk5.v12.3.0/ble_sdk_app_gzll.html?cp=4_0_1_4_7_1"&gt;multiprotocol BLE and Gazell&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Gazell nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/88088?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2017 15:14:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:22966dcd-1e12-4e9f-a788-61946a38d177</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;And btw. if you are designing new HW it might be good to consider migration to nRF52 as it is more powerful, yet more power efficient and BOM cost isn&amp;#39;t big difference. There should be experimental Gazell support since SDK v12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Gazell nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/88087?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2017 15:12:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9053dcc5-adaf-4822-b06f-097d62a96156</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not the expert on Gazell, I&amp;#39;ve never used it, but &lt;a href="http://developer.nordicsemi.com/nRF51_SDK/nRF51_SDK_v7.x.x/doc/7.2.0/s110/html/a00105.html"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; looks like it should work with any S1xx Soft Device...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Gazell nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/88086?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2017 02:53:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:47a04ab3-e108-4956-8e4e-abdd5bdaba22</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Kohlsmith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So... you&amp;#39;re saying that the gzll_* functions are available with all softdevices, not just s210? This was not obvious to me, but I think I see it now (there is a gzll_nrf51_gcc.a static library in the API directory, although I&amp;#39;m having trouble linking it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Gazell nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/88085?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2017 00:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c7f97ba3-6574-4815-ab6e-fe49dbdda9fb</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andrew,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your observation is correct, Nordic was solving ANT &amp;quot;licensing&amp;quot; on nRF51 by producing specific HW variants (nRF514xx) which are then running with ANT compatible radio stacks (there is even ANT+BLE variant). If you don&amp;#39;t need ANT then you can use &amp;quot;BLE only&amp;quot; stacks S110/120/130 and these will run exactly the same on nRF514xx as well as nRF518xx, but S210/S310 run only on nR514xx.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To the Gazell: I believe that this Nordic-proprietary protocol is similar to ShockBurst (and ESB;) in terms of compatibility and licensing: it runs &amp;quot;beside&amp;quot; BLE/ANT stacks and it can run on any HW variant from nRF5x family. If you want to run it on your nRF51 DK then with your variant according to compatibility matrix (see on &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf51/dita/nrf51/pdflinks/nrf51_comp_matrix.html?cp=3_0"&gt;Infocenter&lt;/a&gt;) you should be able to use the &amp;quot;latest&amp;quot; nRF5 SDK v12.3.0 (v13 drops nRF51 support for the moment) and there are Gazell examples ready for PCA10031 (at least I see it in &lt;code&gt;.\nRF5_SDK_12.3.0_d7731ad\examples\proprietary_rf\gzll\gzp_dynamic_pairing\host\&lt;/code&gt; ).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers Jan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>