<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/22987/does-any-softdevice-support-mesh-per-ble5</link><description>Hello, I&amp;#39;m pretty sure the new BLE 5 will come out soon and it will integrate the mesh. And if mesh needs to be done at a protocol level, it must be the softdevice. 
 So, any softdevice so far support mesh? Or at least, any plans? 
 I&amp;#39;m usre nrf52840</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:08:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/22987/does-any-softdevice-support-mesh-per-ble5" /><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90463?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:08:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2cbd2384-5287-43d5-94e4-dae0284e703a</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As you may already notice, yesterday Bluetooth Sig has &lt;a href="https://www.bluetooth.com/what-is-bluetooth-technology/how-it-works/le-mesh"&gt;released&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href="https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/mesh-specifications"&gt;Bluetooth Mesh specification v1.0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We also released the Mesh SDK v0.9.1 today. Please have a look &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/blogs/1147/introducing-nrf5-sdk-for-mesh/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s hope with Bluetooth Mesh, we will be able to really solve the connectivity problem with home automation and more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90455?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:14:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:335879a7-3af5-433d-b3cf-83da44d06c27</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I do agree that 2.4GHz has potential to be good &amp;quot;local&amp;quot; low power networking medium and technologies on top of it are promising. That&amp;#39;s why I&amp;#39;m interested into experience of other people in the industry. However so far I haven&amp;#39;t seen really usable solution (I do hate this approach when someone does it to my delivery  = judging by the worst case experience - but let&amp;#39;s be honest it has a point) and no, anything more then few seconds of reliable data transports over 3 hops isn&amp;#39;t acceptable for most of indoor applications (at least in my business;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90459?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 07:35:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4933ad12-7bf2-4082-917c-fa68cd0d9c50</guid><dc:creator>Mitch996</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny in the symposium I participated the BT people made it sound like BLE is the super communication apparatus free from all the interference especially wifi, with all the frequency hopping etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90460?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 07:35:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e10dce60-1cce-4ad2-be6b-ccac213378c2</guid><dc:creator>Mitch996</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@ endnode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I take it you didn&amp;#39;t really look into that github project I mentioned... doesn&amp;#39;t matter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, latency? At this point I don&amp;#39;t really care because like you said I&amp;#39;m using it for the water meter kind of application... so yea, 2 hours maybe a problem, or even 10 minutes, but 5? Not really at this point, I don&amp;#39;t know if things will move toward the demanding direction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far I got a 10 nodes network working in a &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; environment, meaning little wifi and other stuff and the latency is acceptable (&amp;lt;30s usually, my methods are quite primitive), I&amp;#39;m migrating it to another platform right after I can propagate short messages through out the network. Because of the hasty migration, I don&amp;#39;t have time to do a more in-depth gathering of all specs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90458?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:23:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1197fd40-735d-4140-91f4-e841a5401b32</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So my question is opposite: have you achieved good latency in real environment (!= 3 dev kits on your lab test bench!) with any of these mesh technologies? If yes I would very eagerly learn the details!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90457?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:22:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:682902b0-53a3-4a8d-96cc-245d54958b9b</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This would be for week-long work shop and not discussion over the forum, but we have evaluated like one year ago 5-10 low-power mesh network solutions, closed source/open source, BLE based/2.4GHz proprietary/sub-GHz and once you bring it to office floor full of people, machines, WiFi and other noise suddenly nothing was usable for our purpose. Yes, if you have Wirepas network in urban area and you want to read water meter state once a day (so you don&amp;#39;t care if you get the value now or in 5 minutes or in 2 hours) then it&amp;#39;s OK. If you want to get information (hundreds of bytes) over several hops reliably within seconds not minutes nothing worked for us. I hope these solutions are evolving so it will get better but things we have tried were under heavy development for 3+ years so I don&amp;#39;t expect magic happening since then.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90456?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:09:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4658fa1c-9cb4-4a0c-8d7f-0446d6f6378e</guid><dc:creator>Mitch996</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@endnode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sending a pigeon would be faster and more reliable&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What? Have you tried these?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.com/NordicSemiconductor/nRF51-ble-bcast-mesh"&gt;github.com/.../nRF51-ble-bcast-mesh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think about it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90446?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2017 19:10:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:585a0d6f-e917-42c6-b6ac-c6c6ad84d3ef</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been in contact with Bluetooth SIG this week, and been told it will be released this month(July).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90452?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 05:47:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:85d6d470-ed84-4cd7-a939-fffc5ae1d275</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well there are people working on it for 3+ years as their core business and still these networks are barely usable for anything else then sending few bytes per day and having agility in the network in the range of dozens of seconds up to dozens of minutes. I&amp;#39;ve evaluated things like Wirepas PINO, CSR mesh, Nordic experimental BLE mesh and few more, none of them hold in larger scale and real environment (2.4GHz noise), packets were traveling minutes. So yes, it transports the data but I have completely different performance requirements so I wouldn&amp;#39;t even call it &amp;quot;network&amp;quot; (sending a pigeon would be faster and more reliable). More people researching the better but let&amp;#39;s not pretend that this problem was waiting for some big corp R&amp;amp;D guru who would suddenly make it working (also outside the lab and not only on his desk with 4 dev kits).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90454?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 01:42:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d822eeb1-cac0-4e55-b053-fe5f6217711b</guid><dc:creator>Mitch996</dc:creator><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;don&amp;#39;t look at me if you believe in mash network magic;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello @endnode according to my intel, all the big players, Sony, Samsung, Apple etc. are working on it... I do not suppose they are just going to waste all those hard earned corporate dough, are they?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90444?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:51:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1cd46725-4556-439c-8058-9f30e674101d</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;(I would simply be down to Earth with &amp;quot;mesh networking&amp;quot; buzz word as I haven&amp;#39;t seen any of them working reliably in practice yet. Messing it with main standard would probably lead to more disappointments and harming BT brand, that&amp;#39;s how I read it. But I&amp;#39;m pessimist, don&amp;#39;t look at me if you believe in mash network magic;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90462?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:44:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e6647927-3baf-48eb-9feb-111b44ddf206</guid><dc:creator>Mitch996</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Hung Bui
I think I understand what you mean, but emotionally I find it very difficult to accept. So... basically we are looking at a Mesh protocol/stack that happens to share a lot of common traits with BT, instead of a BT protocol/stack that has Mesh as one of its features?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does this imply on the softdevices? Do I have to mount a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT softdevice if I want to use BLE Mesh, at the cost of a lot of BLE legacy features being unavailable? And by that I mean for example, there won&amp;#39;t be S132M SD which is S123+Mesh, but rather, S500, which doesn&amp;#39;t really share much with S110, or S140, or any previous SDs?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90445?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:34:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7ac24ea7-d446-45f8-aaca-e841be7a6c2a</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;No, Bluetooth Mesh is not part of Bluetooth 5.0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure from where and what you have heard, but except for advertising and scanning based on BLE in Bluetooth 4.0, all layers on top of that in Bluetooth Mesh is completely new. I wouldn&amp;#39;t say Bluetooth Mesh is BLE. It&amp;#39;s a totally new protocol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90447?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:25:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e07931ad-ecc4-401c-bcb2-20d33ff51b01</guid><dc:creator>Mitch996</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Hung Bui  hello, your answer is too diplomatic-ish, too vague, what do you mean by that, are you saying that Mesh won&amp;#39;t be a part of the BT 5 at all? Or are you saying that there is a separate, independent version of BLE specs specifically for mesh?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is completely different from what I&amp;#39;ve heard????&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90453?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:40:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5eec6150-6ec8-48fa-ab0f-a097e2f9d6ea</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m sorry that we can&amp;#39;t give you any information about release dates from Bluetooth Sig.
But one thing need to be clear out, Bluetooth MESH and Bluetooth 5.0 are not related. Bluetooth 5.0 new features are not utilized in the Bluetooth MESH spec at least on this version which base barely on Bluetooth 4.2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if you are looking for long range Bluetooth Mesh, you may get disappointed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90461?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:08:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:68be0484-249c-47fb-8236-831b225754c2</guid><dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;At the Nordic Tech Tour seminar I attended they mentioned a rumor of Bluetooth SIG announcing Bluetooth Mesh in July. Nordic works closely with the Bluetooth SIG and they develop their softdevice in parallel with their work for the Bluetooth SIG, so you can expect it a few days after the announcement. Note that this is only a rumor, so I don&amp;#39;t know how much of it holds up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90443?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d469e9b0-1874-4541-8e05-a141ad047e3f</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well then I will sit and wait for that massive breakthrough;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90442?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:34:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a13cc154-8ba8-4089-ac11-1200445ffea8</guid><dc:creator>Mitch996</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m afraid it&amp;#39;s company secret, I don&amp;#39;t wanna get in trouble lol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90451?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:11:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1108a8ae-0179-4043-9807-c20fcdbe301d</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems it was &lt;a href="https://blog.bluetooth.com/trashed"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HUGE&lt;/strong&gt; in November 2016&lt;/a&gt;;)))&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90450?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:09:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a7655590-aeb4-4905-8f47-bc9683827e64</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.giphy.com/media/MP1kygLQzjCve/giphy.gif"&gt;Tell me more!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90449?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6e588ce3-f247-46ca-97a4-008ff8fe3d76</guid><dc:creator>Mitch996</dc:creator><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t see any indications they would be close to the release... am I missing something?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wanna make a bet ? ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Does any softdevice support Mesh, per BLE5?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/90448?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:45:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fb7ed3a2-e978-48d3-b1ff-98ab53837e74</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Aren&amp;#39;t you still mixing major spec release (which is basically buzzword) and particular features/mendments (profile specifications)? If there will be any update to BT SIG specification it will be 5.1, 5.2 etc. If chip supports &amp;quot;BT5&amp;quot; or not is almost useless as most of the features are optional anyway (as they were in 4.2/4.1). And while BT SIG are working on &amp;quot;mesh networking&amp;quot; adoption into the standard (or separate amendment) I don&amp;#39;t see any indications they would be close to the release... am I missing something? As I follow Nordic they won&amp;#39;t release anything before BT SIG official announcement but maybe you get lucky, let&amp;#39;s see;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>