<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Android LE Connection Update terminates with Reason Connection Timeout</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/23512/android-le-connection-update-terminates-with-reason-connection-timeout</link><description>I&amp;#39;m trying to figure out why &amp;quot;some&amp;quot; (as in not all of them) Android Devices drop my Bluetooth Low Energy connection (to an NRF52 which I don&amp;#39;t think is the problem) after a few seconds. 
 The behavior within the HCI Snoops reveals the following: 
 </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:19:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/23512/android-le-connection-update-terminates-with-reason-connection-timeout" /><item><title>RE: Android LE Connection Update terminates with Reason Connection Timeout</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/92360?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:19:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e29d08ef-ca14-46c8-bdac-6f8d94145767</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;At step 4. Are you sure about the connection parameter update ? Usually when the central update the connection parameter, it will not set Connection Interval Min and Connection Interval Max, it will just Connection interval.
Usually it&amp;#39;s only the peripheral sending request with connection interval min and max.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Supervision timeout 20 means 20 seconds ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you mean by &amp;quot;update the slave latency wrongly&amp;quot; ? I don&amp;#39;t see anything wrong with slave latency here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>