<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF51822 moving from the wlcsp to the qfn48</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/2404/nrf51822-moving-from-the-wlcsp-to-the-qfn48</link><description>We are considering moving from the nrf51822 wlcsp to the qfn48. 
 We would like to minimize the changes to our design. Can we, should we keep our wlcsp antenna design and reuse it with the qfn48. 
 What are the advantages and disadvantages of using</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 08:12:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/2404/nrf51822-moving-from-the-wlcsp-to-the-qfn48" /><item><title>RE: nRF51822 moving from the wlcsp to the qfn48</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/9785?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 08:12:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e7904075-9adb-4d51-8ec9-fb2d78595e58</guid><dc:creator>FormerMember</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,
Kristin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>