<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>POF warning question</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/25234/pof-warning-question</link><description>Hello, 
 This is a quick question regarding the behavior of the Power Supervisor POF warning. We implemented a fairly naive use of the POF warning where we would log an POF event whenever we received a POF warning. We set the POF warning threshold to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:52:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/25234/pof-warning-question" /><item><title>RE: POF warning question</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/99424?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:52:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8b064e31-4097-4119-92c1-7ff53ae750f2</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;4: It might not be mentioned explicitly anywhere. It is one of those &amp;quot;better safe than sorry&amp;quot;-scenarios. It is generally recommended to shut down your peripherals when not in use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: POF warning question</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/99426?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:34:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4ec308e1-853c-4999-865b-656e925f94ff</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I have what I need here so I am marking the question answered and closed. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: POF warning question</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/99423?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:17:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:aca314c5-bda7-4072-87c7-38ace9ba9b76</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Also note, we are making an addtional change to our implementation. We are adding a battery measurement to the event handler rather than using the last measurement made. We are also looking at checking the battery voltage via a timer some short time after the event before taking any action to shut down gracefully. 2.7V actually provides us with quite a bit of margin unless we have something like a short on the board.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: POF warning question</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/99422?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:48:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f584516c-48f9-4b3d-93cc-7cd79487fdf1</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A1: That&amp;#39;s what I thought since brownout looks to be controlled by the same logic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A2:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1: With the data we have the 3.4V was measured within a minute of the event. Not close enough, but it is doubtful the battery truly discharged below 2.7. A transient dip seems much more likely.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2: Absolutely IMHO. I&amp;#39;m an embedded FW guy, but that seems very likely. We&amp;#39;ll see what the HW guys say.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3: We have a meeting in an hour or so. I strongly suspect a HW guy will get that action in the meeting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4: That&amp;#39;s good to know. Nothing I read before suggested this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5: Thanks for the suggestion. Plus the LPCOMP uses less power which is always a plus for us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: POF warning question</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/99425?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:48:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c4aff0ee-00e1-4cbc-a567-a497073943f0</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Q1. You just need a little dip below the threshold to trigger warning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q2. I haven&amp;#39;t been able to find reports of false triggers like this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Do I understand it correctly that you measure 3.4V right before and/or right after the POF warning?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Is it possible that current spikes caused by e.g. the radio turning on or by other circuitry on your device cause a voltage drop low enough to trigger the warning?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Is it possible for you to use an oscilloscope to monitor the supply voltage?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It is advisable to disable/enable the POF right before/after your device goes to sleep. It needs HFCLK to run and it is safer to gracefully turn it off while it is not in use.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If the problem persists you might consider using LPCOMP instead and see if that helps.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>