<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>About the problem of LE1 using dynamic payload to do Multiceiver</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/2588/about-the-problem-of-le1-using-dynamic-payload-to-do-multiceiver</link><description>Hi all, 
 I&amp;#39;m using the LE1 to do the mutilceiver,if I donn&amp;#39;t use the dynamic payload,I can do it successfully.However,if I use the dynamic payload to do Multiceiver,the PRX cann&amp;#39;t receive any data.Could you give me some advise? 
 I have enabled all</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 12:24:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/2588/about-the-problem-of-le1-using-dynamic-payload-to-do-multiceiver" /><item><title>RE: About the problem of LE1 using dynamic payload to do Multiceiver</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/10250?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 12:24:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:62b88451-d3fc-4b0e-9a23-f256f02629b1</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Hakon,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you so much for your reply.I have done it as you said,but the PRX stiil cann&amp;#39;t receive any data.Is there any other I need to pay attention?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: About the problem of LE1 using dynamic payload to do Multiceiver</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/10249?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 13:41:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a91399df-9827-4d20-9eda-d4bbb9dcc213</guid><dc:creator>H&amp;#229;kon Alseth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the TX example, you have mixed up registers DYNPD and FEATURE:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;	SPI_RW_Reg(WRITE_REG + FEATURE, 0x3F);				//Ê¹ÄÜFEATUREµÄEN_DPLÎ»
	SPI_RW_Reg(WRITE_REG + DYNPD, 0x04);				//Ê¹ÄÜDYNPDµÄDPL_P0
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The feature register should be 0x04, and dynpd should be 0x3F.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Håkon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>