<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Available 16-bit UUIDs</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/26248/available-16-bit-uuids</link><description>Hi everyone, 
 I have been reading the Specifications of Bluetooth 4.1, mostly about Universally Unique Identifiers (UUIDs) for Services, Characteristics, etc. 
 I found a case of a device which has an implementation of a custom service with four characteristics</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 22:17:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/26248/available-16-bit-uuids" /><item><title>RE: Available 16-bit UUIDs</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/103344?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 22:17:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6d4f673a-fd2b-41e8-8216-8035da24073d</guid><dc:creator>Jos&amp;#233; Villanueva</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks endnode, now I know they wanted me to doubt about my researches. Also, I agree with you in that they should generate their own 128-bit UUID which as you say is &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; and would help them comply with their BT SIG certification, which as far as I know, they are just starting the process to get one.
I should talk to them again and make them understand how much respecting even the smallest detail of the BT SIG Specifications accounts for having a quality device in every aspect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Available 16-bit UUIDs</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/103343?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:19:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:62e378ce-5edc-43c0-9465-1616e1662f9f</guid><dc:creator>endnode</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You were right and them wrong: all 16-bit UUIDs mapped to default 128-bit BT SIG UUID base are restricted in the Bluetooth world to GATT objects specified by the group and they are not &amp;quot;free to use&amp;quot;. Last 512 numbers in that space (0xFE00..0xFFFF) are allocated to organizations/corporations but they are all subject of registration and fee. Indeed you might disrespect this rule and hard to say if anything wrong happens... but formally you shouldn&amp;#39;t do it. It&amp;#39;s pretty clearly visible in these two UUID lists on BT SIG page: &lt;a href="https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/assigned-numbers/16-bit-uuids-for-members"&gt;16-bit UUIDs for members&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/assigned-numbers/16-bit-uuids-for-sdos"&gt;16-bit UUIDs for SDOs&lt;/a&gt;. So your customer or supplier is most probably violating BT SIG certification of their device (if they have any) and as it is so easy and &amp;quot;free of charge&amp;quot; to generate custom 128-bit UUID base it&amp;#39;s pretty lame not doing it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>