<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Schematic mismatch between OPS document and PDK schematic</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/27758/schematic-mismatch-between-ops-document-and-pdk-schematic</link><description>Hi! 
 I&amp;#39;ve found mismatch between schematic reference from Product spec ( here , page 692) and PCA10056 PCB (Preview Development Kit) for same operational mode. 
 In specification sheet pin E24 called DEC6 (instead DEC2 in PDK) and it&amp;#39;s combined with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 10:42:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/27758/schematic-mismatch-between-ops-document-and-pdk-schematic" /><item><title>RE: Schematic mismatch between OPS document and PDK schematic</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/109501?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 10:42:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b69fba99-be89-4b91-9bae-701e777303f2</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was changed between reference design v0.5.0 and v0.5.1, because the latest design proved to give slightly better performance. PDK was designed a while back and after the guidelines in v0.5.0. So in other words, I recommend that you stick to the v0.5.1 reference design in the OPS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>