<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why isn&amp;#39;t the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/27851/why-isn-t-the-nrf51-sdk-on-git</link><description>While it&amp;#39;s easy enough to download the SDK from Nordic&amp;#39;s website, it&amp;#39;s a slow and painful process. 
 It&amp;#39;s slow I assume because the site is hosted far away from me. Loading all the pages to get to the SDK download is a time consuming process. 
 It&amp;#39;s</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:09:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/27851/why-isn-t-the-nrf51-sdk-on-git" /><item><title>RE: Why isn't the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/244277?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1021d63d-eff7-44c8-8290-509ecec321dd</guid><dc:creator>geoffrey.vl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any update regarding this? I was looking for adding the nRF5 Connect SDK as git submodule too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why isn't the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/109744?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 09:06:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4c4baafd-9af5-4c05-97d8-fdea79a266f1</guid><dc:creator>ekrashtan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Øyvind,
is it possible to access SDK bugtracker or create pull requests for few bugfixes?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why isn't the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/109743?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 23:57:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:51f7875d-a9eb-4d47-89b6-847004245931</guid><dc:creator>Farhang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Any updates on this Øyvind? It has been &amp;gt;2 years now.
It will make everyone&amp;#39;s life easier if the SDK source code was on a repository we could all pull from (github or any other server), this way we could see the changeset, and add our own local changes to it in our local system, and have multiple projects access the latest and greatest!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why isn't the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/109742?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 18:21:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:cca1a012-e5a9-408b-add1-6a343d362c92</guid><dc:creator>Niklas Wigertz Danielsson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Any updates? It&amp;#39;s been over a year now&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why isn't the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/109741?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2016 05:01:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:54e6ed95-6163-4f48-aec2-b2ab80336465</guid><dc:creator>tpor9095</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just wanted to add my support for this notion.  The ability to add the SDK as a git submodule would be splendid.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why isn't the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/109740?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 20:23:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:20ca232c-b85f-48a5-a14c-6121f82f9bb9</guid><dc:creator>Nikolaus Wittenstein</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This would be amazing!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why isn't the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/109739?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 23:54:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c2fcecd0-593e-47ef-b193-bffda4983f15</guid><dc:creator>Cameron Tacklind</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am very curious what specific licensing issues you&amp;#39;re worried about&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why isn't the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/109738?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 06:45:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b14d6021-3916-4913-894b-9d613897139a</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind Karlsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are considering options to be able to bring the SDK to github. We are working on getting the licensing in order to do so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Øyvind&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why isn't the nRF51 SDK on git?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/109737?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 06:19:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6b1b72f0-e82e-440c-8c89-26ee57e81bc1</guid><dc:creator>Mahesh Venkitachalam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I second this suggestion. For licensing reasons, Nordic may not be able to put it on github. But they can host their own git repo which people can pull from. The current zip file scheme is very clunky and it&amp;#39;s not easy to pull/push bug fixes easily. There are issues that have been broken for a while and continuous releases via git could have fixed them with much less frustration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>