<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/28174/nrf52840-coded-phy-sensitivity-with-soft-device-6-0-0-6-alpha</link><description>Hi, 
 although the NRF52840 has a nominal receiver sensitivity of -103 dbm I am only able to get a sensitivity of around -97 dbm. I know there was a bug in older soft device versions resulting in a decreased sensitivity, but I am using soft device 6</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:42:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/28174/nrf52840-coded-phy-sensitivity-with-soft-device-6-0-0-6-alpha" /><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/127012?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:42:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ea4c9bed-7015-4ecb-948e-fa488f0b2ee6</guid><dc:creator>Susheel Nuguru</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The documentation was updated today, Engineering B chips are supported by SDK15 and S140v6.0 production release. Link to compatibility matrix is &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.nordic.infocenter.nrf52%2Fdita%2Fnrf52%2Fcompatibility_matrix%2FnRF52840_ic_rev_sdk_sd_comp_matrix.html&amp;amp;cp=2_0_2_2"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/125323?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:55:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:65898b9b-5c06-4f3d-b4f8-220777dc0c29</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately we only recommend sticking to the Compatibility matrix and use development SW on development HW.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/125167?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:03:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:dfcb321d-fa15-4873-b842-6c6d68e630e2</guid><dc:creator>matsublox</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What about the combination of production SW and Rev B chip. Will that be appropriate to do range testing with?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/125111?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:25:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3929e4c8-53f9-41b6-b46f-09ebfde14b4f</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alpha -6 is not strictly compatible with Engineering B silicon (refer to the &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52/dita/nrf52/compatibility_matrix/nRF52840_ic_rev_sdk_sd_comp_matrix.html?cp=2_0_2_2"&gt;compatibility matrix&lt;/a&gt;).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The alpha -6 &lt;em&gt;includes&lt;/em&gt; a workaround for erratum &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52840.EngA.errata/anomaly_840_164.html?cp=2_0_1_2_1_52"&gt;[164] RADIO: Low selectivity in long range mode&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(which isn&amp;#39;t actually necessary on Engineering B since it is fixed in silicon).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The alpha -6 &lt;em&gt;lacks&lt;/em&gt; a workaround for erratum&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52840.EngB.errata/dita/errata/nRF52840/EngineeringB/latest/anomaly_840_191.html?cp=2_0_1_1_1_23"&gt;[191] RADIO: High packet error rate in BLE Long Range mode&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;which will degrade the range performance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I wouldn&amp;#39;t recommend doing long range tests on Engineering B with alpha -6. Production versions of both the IC and an accompanying Softdevice are just around the corner.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/124599?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:42:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0a16680c-0d1d-49ad-8bae-64f716314dc7</guid><dc:creator>matsublox</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Picking up this thread again ... We have Rev B devices and would like to do some range measurements for an application where the range is very important. We are using your range measurement example. This means that we want to have an optimal setup for this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When is the Softdevice with support&amp;nbsp; for Rev B sensitivity fix available?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we use the Rev B devices and -6 revision of the Softdevice do we still loose about 6 dBm in sensitivity?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/111288?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:06:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:16cb9da2-14c8-4c42-9fb1-4ce9a433c75b</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A second thing to mention is that although we initially stated that the 840 would be capable of +9dBm output power we have had to reduce that value to +8dBm. This is documented in the &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52/dita/nrf52/chips/nrf52840_ps.html?cp=2_0_0"&gt;OPS 0.5.1&lt;/a&gt;. Have you measure the actual output power?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/111289?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:06:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e4991251-bdde-4a68-b092-cbfab0301d6f</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, sounds like a solid setup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52/dita/nrf52/compatibility_matrix/nRF52840_ic_revision_overview.html?cp=2_0_2_0"&gt;chip revision&lt;/a&gt; do you have? I&amp;#39;m not sure if rev B has reached the market yet, so probably Rev A?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52840.EngA.errata/anomaly_840_164.html?cp=2_0_1_1_1_50"&gt;Product anomaly in IC Rev A&lt;/a&gt; that degrades the sensitivity. A workaround for this anomaly was introduced in S140 v6.0.0-6.alpha. However, although the workaround is included in -6-alpha it hasn&amp;#39;t fixed the product anomaly entirely. We have corrected the anomaly in Rev B, but a we have yet to release a Softdevice optimized for this new revision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/111287?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:56:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c9da5198-3cd2-452f-b02d-3d7663e60889</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;With the digital attenuator set to 0dB, the whole setup has an attenuation of 8db, I used a transmission power of 9dbm, but I was only able to set the attenuator to around 97 db until the connection of the boards dropped, and the output of the boards showed -96 dbm rssi which seems logical for this setup, but I was not able to reach the -103 dbm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in Advance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Christian&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/111286?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:54:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:49ad69d3-2c6f-46e9-b21c-e59123f2349d</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Martin,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I used the att_mtu_throughput example and modified it to start RSSI measurement after connection establishment (by using sd_ble_gap_rssi_start(m_conn_handle, 0,0);). The RSSI is then printed by adding the following lines to the event handler:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;case  BLE_GAP_EVT_RSSI_CHANGED:
{
NRF_LOG_INFO(&amp;quot;RSSI: %i&amp;quot;,p_ble_evt-&amp;gt;evt.gap_evt.params.rssi_changed.rssi);
} break;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the measurement I used two nRF52840 boards, each one of them in a Rohde &amp;amp; Schwarz shielding box to avoid external interferences. The boards are connected to the output of the boxes via SMA Cable and an SWF to SMA Adapter on the J1 Port of the Boards. The boxes itself are connected via a digital attenuator to guarantee a controllable channel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Coded Phy Sensitivity with soft device 6.0.0-6.alpha</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/111285?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:41:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d9fad5b3-055f-4b2e-9180-4476ed81183a</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How do you measure this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>