<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>power consumption of S130 (use as peripheral only) vs S110</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/28207/power-consumption-of-s130-use-as-peripheral-only-vs-s110</link><description>Hi there, 
 I was trying to use S110 to implement my project but found there is no more release for that after SDK 8 and I have concerns on bug fixes won&amp;#39;t be merged back. 
 As S130 can work in dual roles (peripheral and central), I&amp;#39;d think just use</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:18:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/28207/power-consumption-of-s130-use-as-peripheral-only-vs-s110" /><item><title>RE: power consumption of S130 (use as peripheral only) vs S110</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/111430?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:18:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b763f6ca-0273-4413-b560-eceb79641128</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no reason to believe one is better than the other. I did a couple of measurements:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S110 sleep current only = 3,76uA:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/s110-short.PNG" alt="S110 short" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S110 average over ~4.8s with advertising intervals at ~190ms = 155uA&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/s110-long.PNG" alt="S110 long" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S130 sleep current only = 3.90uA:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/s130-short.PNG" alt="S130 short" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S130 average over ~4.8s with advertising intervals at ~190ms = 150uA:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/s130-long.PNG" alt="S130 long" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you can see, in sleep mode the difference is 140 nA in favour of S110. The average current over 5 seconds differ by 5 uA in favour of S130. Both differences can be attributed to measurement errors. The PPK&amp;#39;s measurement resolution in the 0-70uA range is 200 nA and average current over 5 seconds depends for example on how many scan requests the device receives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: power consumption of S130 (use as peripheral only) vs S110</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/111429?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:46:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6203a9fe-03a5-4691-912c-81071fea4059</guid><dc:creator>carlche</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone from Nordic tested this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>