Is it possible to underclock my nRF51822 to save power?

RE: Is it possible to underclock my nRF51822 to save power?

MartinBL — Mon, 08 Jan 2018 13:25:38 GMT

I'm not sure if I understand the thought behind that last question, but in the nRF5 series it is actually possible to power down parts of the RAM to save power.

RE: Is it possible to underclock my nRF51822 to save power?

tyler — Fri, 05 Jan 2018 17:33:25 GMT

Does that also mean that if I lower the amount of RAM it will also use more power?

RE: Is it possible to underclock my nRF51822 to save power?

RK — Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:26:52 GMT

There's always plenty of idle time for the CPU, the radio does most of the work and the CPU only wakes up long enough to process. In general however BLE is power optimised for peripherals and centrals use more power. You can use the Nordic's Power Profiler to model power usage in different situations and give yourself a better answer to your own question.

RE: Is it possible to underclock my nRF51822 to save power?

tyler — Thu, 04 Jan 2018 21:17:21 GMT

Does the same apply for a device that is constantly scanning? Like the intervals are small enough in between scans that there is very little idle time.

RE: Is it possible to underclock my nRF51822 to save power?

Turbo J — Thu, 04 Jan 2018 17:34:11 GMT

if it is possible to lower the clock speed / underclock the device to save power

Nope. The oscillators are fixed frequency - so they can start up faster.

Modern µC are designed for low avarage power in what is called "race to idle". That means a significant power draw at high procressing speed - but only for a short active time and then switching to a low power idle state for the majority of time.

That is why you can run the NRF5x from a CR2032 (~10 mA current shorted) with a few >=10 µF reservouir capacitors.