<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF52840-QIAABB rx sensitivity using DCDC</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/29482/nrf52840-qiaabb-rx-sensitivity-using-dcdc</link><description>Hi, as per subject, I would like to know the trade-offs of using the internal DCDC vs LDO when it comes to RX sensitivity specific to the nRF52840-QIAABB variant.
From this post devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../ 
it says that the RX sensitivity is reduced</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:04:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/29482/nrf52840-qiaabb-rx-sensitivity-using-dcdc" /><item><title>RE: nRF52840-QIAABB rx sensitivity using DCDC</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/117203?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:04:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b864cce5-ab53-4ab4-ba65-e32d3cddde6f</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There are no known pan issues for this. On the nRF52832 this was only an issue on the csp variant. see &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52832.Rev2.errata/dita/errata/nRF52832/Rev2/latest/anomaly_832_91.html#anomaly_832_91"&gt;Errata nr 91&lt;/a&gt;. We do not have csp variant of the nRF52840 yet, so I cannot say if this will be a problem or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>