nRF52 SDK ANT example "ant_scan_and_forward" example MAX_DEVICES limit?

RE: nRF52 SDK ANT example "ant_scan_and_forward" example MAX_DEVICES limit?

Steph van Schalkwyk — Tue, 13 Feb 2018 01:58:55 GMT

I changed the nod_id to uint16_t.

Hint: Make sure that MAX_DEVICE is a PRIME NUMBER to minimize hash collisions. Alternatively, use quadratic probing or another method.

RE: nRF52 SDK ANT example "ant_scan_and_forward" example MAX_DEVICES limit?

Steph van Schalkwyk — Thu, 08 Feb 2018 15:45:27 GMT

Hi Martin

Thank you.

I have a question re adding burst or advanced burst to the scan and forward:

If M1 sends a beacon, S1 receives and replies to M1 with "send me an update using advanced burst", M1 receives and sends advanced burst to S1.

Will this work? I have combined advanced burst into the example and I can send advanced burst on keypress (on demand), but not yet triggered by ACK from S1.

If this doesn't meet protocol requirements, how should I increase the scan_and_forward buffer to send 24 bytes as had been suggested earlier? I would have to send updates around the network piecemeal in that case (i.e. one sensor per data page).

Your feedback will be invaluable.

Steph

RE: nRF52 SDK ANT example "ant_scan_and_forward" example MAX_DEVICES limit?

Mttrinh — Thu, 08 Feb 2018 08:29:54 GMT

Hi,

I think you can safely increase the number of MAX_DEVICES up to 0xFE without any changes to the code, because 0xFF is reserved value - used to indicate that node ID is invalid. If you want to increase the value further you need to make some changes in the code. For instance, node address is held within uint8_t variables and one byte in ANT transmitting buffer is allocated for the address value.

Best Regards,

Martin