<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Observing reduced TX packets per connection interval in SDK 14.2 vs SDK 12.2</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/32849/observing-reduced-tx-packets-per-connection-interval-in-sdk-14-2-vs-sdk-12-2</link><description>We have recently ported our application from SDK 12.2 to SDK 14.2. The application is very power sensitive and uses a high connection interval and slave latency to minimise power consumption at idle: 
 
 The application is a datalogger and occasionally</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 14:23:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/32849/observing-reduced-tx-packets-per-connection-interval-in-sdk-14-2-vs-sdk-12-2" /><item><title>RE: Observing reduced TX packets per connection interval in SDK 14.2 vs SDK 12.2</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/129013?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 14:23:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2cfa069b-04da-49f5-95d7-fe375a73056d</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the slow response.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will check this with the stack team and get back to you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What SoftDevice type and version are you using?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Observing reduced TX packets per connection interval in SDK 14.2 vs SDK 12.2</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/127380?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 09:37:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:892c3907-afcc-401c-b5b7-c7238a830b0d</guid><dc:creator>jumpingfool</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We managed to solve this issue by explicitly&amp;nbsp;reducing&amp;nbsp;the connection interval during the transfer events using sd_ble_gap_ppcp_set, then increasing it again when the transfer event has finished.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Strangely&amp;nbsp;though when we make the second call (after the transfer has finished) we get an NRF_ERROR_BUSY response for quite some time - around 20 seconds after the transfer completes. To ensure the connection interval definitely does revert&amp;nbsp;to the longer setting we&amp;#39;ve had to set up a timer that calls&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;sd_ble_gap_ppcp_set repeatedly until a NRF_SUCCESS&amp;nbsp;response is received.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;What might possibly cause this behaviour? Is there any way to see what the softdevice is busy doing? There is no data transfer happening when this occurs.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Observing reduced TX packets per connection interval in SDK 14.2 vs SDK 12.2</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/126746?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 06:41:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:756d8d17-c5b0-4986-9c94-5a0885fe36a3</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you try increasing the&amp;nbsp;NRF_SDH_BLE_GAP_EVENT_LENGTH parameter in sdk_config.h?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have a long connection interval then this could limit the number of packets you are able to send on each connection event.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>