<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>GPIOTE current consumption in nrf52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/33693/gpiote-current-consumption-in-nrf52840</link><description>Hi 
 This is about missing information about current consumption for the GPIOTE peripheral in the v1.0 product specification for the nrf52840. 
 See section 6.10.5 it is empty. 
 
 I have been working with Nordic chips since the early days of nrf51. In</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 14:07:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/33693/gpiote-current-consumption-in-nrf52840" /><item><title>RE: GPIOTE current consumption in nrf52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/263262?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 14:07:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ec0ad568-cf58-4d0f-831e-69dcef47f593</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please register a new question with your inquiry. Regardless I don&amp;#39;t think I would configure the pin with pull down, as I would expect the external unit to control the pin..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: GPIOTE current consumption in nrf52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/263117?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 07:43:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c615fd7f-1880-4e64-9128-8162eb1ffa9e</guid><dc:creator>SebastianA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We see an increased power consumption at around 26uA when enabling GPIOTE IN events in our application with a NRF52840_xxAA_REV1 chip.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We use nRF5_SDK_15.2.0_9412b96 and the following code:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; // reg is NRF_P1, pin is 13&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; reg-&amp;gt;PIN_CNF[pin] &amp;amp;= ~(GPIO_PIN_CNF_DIR_Msk | GPIO_PIN_CNF_INPUT_Msk);&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; reg-&amp;gt;PIN_CNF[pin] |=&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (GPIO_PIN_CNF_DIR_Input &amp;lt;&amp;lt; GPIO_PIN_CNF_DIR_Pos)&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; | (GPIO_PIN_CNF_INPUT_Connect &amp;lt;&amp;lt; GPIO_PIN_CNF_INPUT_Pos);&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; reg-&amp;gt;PIN_CNF[pin] &amp;amp;= ~GPIO_PIN_CNF_PULL_Msk;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; reg-&amp;gt;PIN_CNF[pin] |= GPIO_PIN_CNF_PULL_Pulldown &amp;lt;&amp;lt; GPIO_PIN_CNF_PULL_Pos;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; // slot is 0, portpin is 0x0100 + 13&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; nrf_gpiote_te_default(slot);&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; nrf_gpiote_event_configure(slot, portpin, NRF_GPIOTE_POLARITY_LOTOHI);&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; NRF_GPIOTE-&amp;gt;EVENTS_IN[slot] = 0;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; nrf_gpiote_event_enable(slot);&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; nrf_gpiote_int_enable(1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; slot);&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With this code our application use around 32uA. After removing the call to nrf_gpiote_event_enable, it uses around 5uA. Looking at the graph, I see that it is the baseline that is increased.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the measurement we don&amp;#39;t trigger the pin and the interrupt isn&amp;#39;t called.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;ve also tried the same thing on port P0.11 with the same result.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is this an expected power increase?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: GPIOTE current consumption in nrf52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/170600?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:51:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5f25fb58-1f11-4207-9fbd-187bcdccc924</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, we still have not prioritized to measure these numbers. But as already stated I expect these to be comparable to the nRF52832 GPIOTE current consumption numbers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: GPIOTE current consumption in nrf52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/170471?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:12:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fcee95f6-fe8e-4cba-a5a4-41305e5af236</guid><dc:creator>Anantha Keshava</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/members/run_5f00_ar"&gt;run_ar&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Were you able to get to these numbers? If so would highly appreciate getting these numbers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ananth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: GPIOTE current consumption in nrf52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/129867?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 07:06:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6ea8c6dd-1c3e-40d6-a26a-42061ff7525b</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mahendra,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you have seen some power consumption numbers are missing. This is something we are working on, but the GPIOTE numbers has not been prioritized yet. I would expect it to be similar to the nRF52832 as the IP is similar, except &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52832.Rev2.errata/dita/errata/nRF52832/Rev2/latest/anomaly_832_89.html?cp=2_1_1_0_1_26"&gt;errata 89 &lt;/a&gt;was fixed on nRF52840. However I cannot give any promises before this is put in the PS. I am sorry for the inconvenience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>