<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF24L01+ TX/RX interrupt timing jitter</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/34935/nrf24l01-tx-rx-interrupt-timing-jitter</link><description>Hi, 
 We are using nRF24L01+ modules on an ultrasonic positioning system. For synchronization, we wanted to use the RX and TX interrupts provided by the module to trigger transmission and reception of ultrasonic pulses. (Transmitter transmits a packet</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 14:56:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/34935/nrf24l01-tx-rx-interrupt-timing-jitter" /><item><title>RE: nRF24L01+ TX/RX interrupt timing jitter</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/134398?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 14:56:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b4cafe1a-6e97-4ed8-91e4-46dc156866dd</guid><dc:creator>Thomas K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;That worked, thank you very much!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF24L01+ TX/RX interrupt timing jitter</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/134183?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 12:42:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1582253f-8a88-42b3-9e4b-970b0b90a0b3</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There is also a *noack command you can use, so you don&amp;#39;t need to disable ack.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF24L01+ TX/RX interrupt timing jitter</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/134182?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 12:41:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0e0db8f8-60f7-4564-972c-978a9a49c330</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, but the receiver might have received the packet long time ago (several retransmit periods).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF24L01+ TX/RX interrupt timing jitter</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/134164?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 11:38:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:947667d2-5c16-422a-8610-4333803e0bf7</guid><dc:creator>Thomas K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;They are sent with acknowledge, I will try to disable the ACK and come back to you, thanks! But shouldn&amp;#39;t the TX interrupt only be asserted after the transmit has been successful, i.e. after the ACK has been received?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF24L01+ TX/RX interrupt timing jitter</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/134160?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 11:20:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:455a6f95-e6e9-4008-bd9a-eecd005d749f</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, are you sending the packets with or without acknowledge? If you are using acknowledge there may be re transmits, both in forward and reverse direction. You may use the noack command to send data without acknowledge, then you may lose packets, but the timing will be accurate when successfully received.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>