<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF52840 SPIM3 and tSPIM,VMO,HS 8 ns vs tSPIM,VMO 59 ns</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/35263/nrf52840-spim3-and-tspim-vmo-hs-8-ns-vs-tspim-vmo-59-ns</link><description>The valid master out time for &amp;lt;= 8 MHz is shown as tSPIM,VMO 59 ns. The valid master out time for &amp;gt; 8 MHz is shown as tSPIM,VMO,HS 8 ns. The latter tSPIM,VMO,HS could only apply to SPIM3, since that is the only SPIM that can go over 8 MHz. My question</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:55:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/35263/nrf52840-spim3-and-tspim-vmo-hs-8-ns-vs-tspim-vmo-59-ns" /><item><title>RE: nRF52840 SPIM3 and tSPIM,VMO,HS 8 ns vs tSPIM,VMO 59 ns</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/135558?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:55:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4d6e5410-f2cc-41cf-83a7-503973e6df70</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SPIM3 have been completely redesigned compared to SPIM0-2,&amp;nbsp;and in specific they have better control of timing in SPIM3. You are correct in your suspicion that for SPIM3 it&amp;#39;s 8ns for all frequencies (The table could be clearer. It is still technically correct since it is a max spec and 8 is &amp;lt; than 59.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Kenneth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>