<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Crystalfontz 128x64 LCD shield vs example code on nRF52DK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/35666/crystalfontz-128x64-lcd-shield-vs-example-code-on-nrf52dk</link><description>Has anyone modified the spi_master_using_nrf_spi_master example (or otherwise gotten) the Crystalfontz CFA211TFH 128x64 panel running w/o mods on the nRF52 DK? I have a panel that runs well on an NXP KE06 (this is a low end M0+ core with very few periphs</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 21:11:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/35666/crystalfontz-128x64-lcd-shield-vs-example-code-on-nrf52dk" /><item><title>RE: Crystalfontz 128x64 LCD shield vs example code on nRF52DK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/137538?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 21:11:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:12eb2a9d-8039-474b-961e-e044feb040e4</guid><dc:creator>howard n2wx</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Problem solved.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This LCD panel has two (count &amp;#39;em) chip selects: /CS1 and CS2.&amp;nbsp; Where&amp;#39;d CS2 come from? In any event once I forced that one high all the time and fixed the socket it worked as expected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>