<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Consequences of Remapping NRST on NRF52840 to Different Pin to Avoid Via-in-Pad?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/36054/consequences-of-remapping-nrst-on-nrf52840-to-different-pin-to-avoid-via-in-pad</link><description>The NRF52840 appears to only come in a dual row QFN package and in the reference material, the only way to break out the second row is with an in-pad via or a very small trace. Here is an image of the pads in question for the Altium reference designs</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 13:48:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/36054/consequences-of-remapping-nrst-on-nrf52840-to-different-pin-to-avoid-via-in-pad" /><item><title>RE: Consequences of Remapping NRST on NRF52840 to Different Pin to Avoid Via-in-Pad?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/138994?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 13:48:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2d8d29fd-9fc1-443e-a31c-03da7ad7b4af</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You can use the outer row only. In this case, you will not be able to use the reset pin. This can only be configured to pin P0.18.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reset is not needed for programming, reset can be done from the SWD interface if needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trace is hardwired to a set of pins. If you need trace, you could do that part with the DK instead.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Consequences of Remapping NRST on NRF52840 to Different Pin to Avoid Via-in-Pad?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/138985?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 13:25:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d30dcd6b-ed37-491e-a542-734ac47fa327</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I gave you an answer in the other thread.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Consequences of Remapping NRST on NRF52840 to Different Pin to Avoid Via-in-Pad?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/138871?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 03:18:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c04811c3-0d8b-44cc-8c75-df27bde751fa</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Lloyd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Accidentally necro-bumped this question here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/25750/nrf52840-avoid-via-in-pad-by-connecting-pins-together"&gt;https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/25750/nrf52840-avoid-via-in-pad-by-connecting-pins-together&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It contains some info but doesn&amp;#39;t address the PSELRESET register question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>