<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Compliance of nRf52832 at 50V/m radiated immunity  (MIL-461F)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/36063/compliance-of-nrf52832-at-50v-m-radiated-immunity-mil-461f</link><description>Hi! 
 My design has to be tested at 50V/m according to MIL-461F. Are there any experience with this high field strength or the MIL-standard? I want to avoid the cost of shield cans if possible. 
 The layout is close to the reference design (with DC/DC</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 10:36:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/36063/compliance-of-nrf52832-at-50v-m-radiated-immunity-mil-461f" /><item><title>RE: Compliance of nRf52832 at 50V/m radiated immunity  (MIL-461F)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/138928?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 10:36:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7f812992-3f99-4f92-a151-030668ff4a5c</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;50 V/m is very high. While we haven&amp;#39;t tested this, I believe you must have a shield around as much as possible to avoid taking out the radio completely. Normal field strength tests at ~10 V/m is usually ok without a shield.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>